Comments for Reflections by Susie Wee http://www.susiewee.com/blog A casual blog on work, life, and play. Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:09:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 Comment on New adventure… by Wayne Ye http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2011/04/05/new-adventure/comment-page-1/#comment-5716 Wayne Ye Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:09:21 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/?p=285#comment-5716 Wish you have a successful, tremendous and happy career in the future:) BTW, is it a little bug in this blog? The content in the "footer" is "Array": Array Wish you have a successful, tremendous and happy career in the future:)

BTW, is it a little bug in this blog? The content in the “footer” is “Array”:

Array

]]> Comment on New adventure… by Michael Zerman http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2011/04/05/new-adventure/comment-page-1/#comment-5368 Michael Zerman Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:09:52 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/?p=285#comment-5368 Hope you got some bodysurfing in this time around. Good luck amiga, Michael Z Adelaide AUSTRALIA Hope you got some bodysurfing in this time around.

Good luck amiga,

Michael Z
Adelaide AUSTRALIA

]]> Comment on Qualcomm CES keynote: All consumer devices are going to be cell phones themselves. by vasudev bhaskaran http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/12/qualcomm-ces-keynote-all-consumer-devices-are-going-to-be-cell-phones-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-748 vasudev bhaskaran Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:48:47 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/12/qualcomm-ces-keynote-all-consumer-devices-are-going-to-be-cell-phones-themselves/#comment-748 the observation that all consumer devices are cellphones should be looked at in the more general sense which is what I think Paul was implying.. the computing you get in cell phones is pretty much on par or more than what you have in consumer devices. Thus this gadget we think of as cellphone si capable of lot more things than we imagined. We see it with its connectivity to different display types, we see its connectivity and usage in different scenarios that are not cellphone centric but communications centric and now communicatiosn and processing are reachign equal capabilities and thus one can envision even more concepts in the future where high communications capabilities and high computing availability meet. the observation that all consumer devices are cellphones should be looked at in the more general sense which is what I think Paul was implying.. the computing you get in cell phones is pretty much on par or more than what you have in consumer devices. Thus this gadget we think of as cellphone si capable of lot more things than we imagined. We see it with its connectivity to different display types, we see its connectivity and usage in different scenarios that are not cellphone centric but communications centric and now communicatiosn and processing are reachign equal capabilities and thus one can envision even more concepts in the future where high communications capabilities and high computing availability meet.

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by Paul B. http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-562 Paul B. Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:20:43 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-562 I struggle with the fact that if we ALWAYS play by China's cultural rules, it is a one-way relationship that yields few if any results. Sure we may save a hostage here or there, but funny how the situations keep occurring. What is best for Google and business in general in China, not just the people, is a change is in the ways of the Chinese Government. Sometimes only the light of day can change behavior. I find it interesting that the world's most popular blogger, Chinese himself, is blatantly flipping off Chinese officials in their face (literally). Even the Chinese government is afraid of losing the hearts and minds of its people. Perhaps what Google did will hurt them now but may help everyone in the long term. Obviously, as I think you agree, it is a delicate balance. I struggle with the fact that if we ALWAYS play by China’s cultural rules, it is a one-way relationship that yields few if any results. Sure we may save a hostage here or there, but funny how the situations keep occurring. What is best for Google and business in general in China, not just the people, is a change is in the ways of the Chinese Government. Sometimes only the light of day can change behavior. I find it interesting that the world’s most popular blogger, Chinese himself, is blatantly flipping off Chinese officials in their face (literally). Even the Chinese government is afraid of losing the hearts and minds of its people. Perhaps what Google did will hurt them now but may help everyone in the long term. Obviously, as I think you agree, it is a delicate balance.

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by LiuXiaobo http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-527 LiuXiaobo Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:39:01 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-527 Right or efficient is not the issue here. The issue here is that fundamental principles within business here has been violated. If a firm should be afraid of industrial espionage then their is no reason to stay in that country any more. Google has drawn the line here. That means that there is no way to be efficient if all their tools(source codes and Math also called algorithms) are being stolen by the government. This is not about culture but about fundamental business ethics. It is the government's responsibility to create a safe and stable environment to do business in. Here we clearly see that the Chinese Government has failed badly. Forget about the culture, forget about all these diversions about how to do things right in China. They are just tools made up to make naive foreign investors agree on paying more, accepting more etc. China is full of people like in the rest of the world. The have feelings and interests like the rest of the world. The Chines Government has financial interests like the rest of the world. This is about acquiring technology and knowledge which is strategically useful for the government and government owned firms in China. Nothing else. This is the true hard facts no one dares to speak out aloud. Right or efficient is not the issue here. The issue here is that fundamental principles within business here has been violated. If a firm should be afraid of industrial espionage then their is no reason to stay in that country any more. Google has drawn the line here. That means that there is no way to be efficient if all their tools(source codes and Math also called algorithms) are being stolen by the government. This is not about culture but about fundamental business ethics. It is the government’s responsibility to create a safe and stable environment to do business in. Here we clearly see that the Chinese Government has failed badly. Forget about the culture, forget about all these diversions about how to do things right in China. They are just tools made up to make naive foreign investors agree on paying more, accepting more etc. China is full of people like in the rest of the world. The have feelings and interests like the rest of the world. The Chines Government has financial interests like the rest of the world. This is about acquiring technology and knowledge which is strategically useful for the government and government owned firms in China. Nothing else. This is the true hard facts no one dares to speak out aloud.

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by susiewee http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-524 susiewee Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:46:25 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-524 Thank you all for your comments. I appreciate your different viewpoints and the discussion! Thank you all for your comments. I appreciate your different viewpoints and the discussion!

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by susiewee http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-523 susiewee Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:44:00 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-523 Nice little story. Certainly creating change requires very artful interactions. Being respectful does not mean being passive or agreeable. I think you can create change by being assertive and respectful. Admittedly, I'm an optimist. ;-) Nice little story.

Certainly creating change requires very artful interactions. Being respectful does not mean being passive or agreeable. I think you can create change by being assertive and respectful. Admittedly, I’m an optimist. ;-)

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by susiewee http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-522 susiewee Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:35:04 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-522 It is very interesting to consider how to follow each country's law in cyber-space. Yes, this tear drop has certainly created an overflow! It is very interesting to consider how to follow each country’s law in cyber-space. Yes, this tear drop has certainly created an overflow!

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by susiewee http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-521 susiewee Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:29:54 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-521 Good point. Thanks for adding another perspective to consider. Good point. Thanks for adding another perspective to consider.

]]> Comment on The impact of Google’s bold move by susiewee http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/comment-page-1/#comment-520 susiewee Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:26:53 +0000 http://www.susiewee.com/blog/2010/01/13/the-impact-of-googles-bold-move/#comment-520 Thanks for your comment. I am not at all against the principle. I am mainly discussing the approach used to achieve it. Many approaches can work, so let's see how things play out. Thanks for your comment. I am not at all against the principle. I am mainly discussing the approach used to achieve it. Many approaches can work, so let’s see how things play out.

]]>